Mathematical Statistics: Chapters 5–6

Limit Theorems and Normal-Based Distributions

Statistics
Probability
Author

Donghyun Ko

Published

May 26, 2026

Chapter 5 explains why sample averages behave so well: the Law of Large Numbers (LLN) shows that \(\bar{X}_n\) converges to the true mean \(\mu\), and the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) quantifies the shape and scale of the remaining fluctuations. Chapter 6 derives the three distributions that appear automatically when working with normal data — the chi-square (\(\chi^2\)), \(t\), and \(F\) distributions — which are the probability laws behind confidence intervals, hypothesis tests, and ANOVA.

Chapter 5: Limit Theorems

Behavior of the Sample Mean

Let \(X_1, \ldots, X_n\) be i.i.d. with \(E[X_i] = \mu\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(X_i) = \sigma^2 < \infty\). The sample mean \(\bar{X}_n = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i\) satisfies:

  1. Unbiasedness: \(E[\bar{X}_n] = \mu\)
  2. Variance reduction: \(\operatorname{Var}(\bar{X}_n) = \sigma^2/n\)
  3. Exact normality (when \(X_i \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)\)): \(\bar{X}_n \sim N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)\)

The key insight from property 2: as \(n\) grows, the variability of \(\bar{X}_n\) shrinks at rate \(1/n\), making large deviations from \(\mu\) increasingly unlikely.

Three Modes of Convergence

Because random variables are random, there are several non-equivalent ways to formalize “getting close to a limit.”

Almost sure convergence (\(Z_n \xrightarrow{\text{a.s.}} Z\)): for almost every outcome \(\omega\), the sequence \(Z_n(\omega)\) converges numerically to \(Z(\omega)\). This is the strongest notion.

Convergence in probability (\(Z_n \xrightarrow{p} Z\)): for every \(\varepsilon > 0\), \[\lim_{n\to\infty} P(|Z_n - Z| > \varepsilon) = 0.\] Large deviations become increasingly unlikely, but individual paths need not converge.

Convergence in distribution (\(Z_n \xrightarrow{d} Z\)): the CDFs \(F_n(x) \to F(x)\) at every continuity point of \(F\). This is the weakest notion — it only concerns the shape of distributions, not the values of the random variables.

The implications always go one way: \[Z_n \xrightarrow{\text{a.s.}} Z \;\Rightarrow\; Z_n \xrightarrow{p} Z \;\Rightarrow\; Z_n \xrightarrow{d} Z.\]

When the limit is a constant \(c\), convergence in distribution and convergence in probability coincide.

Continuous mapping principle: if \(Z_n \xrightarrow{p} Z\) and \(g\) is continuous, then \(g(Z_n) \xrightarrow{p} g(Z)\) (and similarly for convergence in distribution). This allows results for \(\bar{X}_n\) to transfer immediately to functions like \(\bar{X}_n^2\).

Chebyshev’s Inequality and the Weak LLN

Chebyshev’s inequality bridges variance and tail probability: for any random variable \(Y\) with mean \(m\) and variance \(v\),

\[P(|Y - m| > \varepsilon) \leq \frac{v}{\varepsilon^2}.\]

Applying this to \(\bar{X}_n\) (which has variance \(\sigma^2/n\)):

\[P(|\bar{X}_n - \mu| > \varepsilon) \leq \frac{\sigma^2}{n\varepsilon^2} \xrightarrow{n\to\infty} 0.\]

This is precisely the Weak Law of Large Numbers (WLLN): \(\bar{X}_n \xrightarrow{p} \mu\).

Strong Law of Large Numbers

The Strong Law of Large Numbers (SLLN) asserts a stronger statement: \(\bar{X}_n \xrightarrow{\text{a.s.}} \mu\), i.e., \(P(\lim_{n\to\infty}\bar{X}_n = \mu) = 1\). With probability one, the sample mean eventually stays arbitrarily close to \(\mu\) and never drifts away again.

The SLLN implies the WLLN. In practice, the WLLN explains why averaging reduces noise, while the SLLN justifies treating long-run averages as stable, deterministic quantities.

Central Limit Theorem

The CLT answers a finer question: not just that \(\bar{X}_n \to \mu\), but what is the shape and scale of the remaining fluctuations?

Theorem (CLT). Let \(X_1, \ldots, X_n\) be i.i.d. with \(E[X_i] = \mu\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(X_i) = \sigma^2 < \infty\). Then

\[\frac{\bar{X}_n - \mu}{\sigma/\sqrt{n}} \xrightarrow{d} N(0,1),\]

equivalently, for large \(n\): \(\bar{X}_n \approx N(\mu, \sigma^2/n)\).

The factor \(\sigma/\sqrt{n}\) is the standard error of the mean: typical errors shrink at rate \(1/\sqrt{n}\). The CLT gives far sharper approximations than Chebyshev — for example:

\[P\!\left(|\bar{X}_n - \mu| > k\sigma/\sqrt{n}\right) \approx P(|Z| > k), \quad Z \sim N(0,1),\]

whereas Chebyshev yields only the crude bound \(1/k^2\).

The CLT applies broadly: Binomial, Gamma, and Negative Binomial random variables can all be written as sums of i.i.d. components, so they are all well-approximated by normal distributions for large \(n\).


Chapter 6: Distributions Derived from the Normal

Chi-Square Distribution

If \(Z \sim N(0,1)\), squaring removes the sign and produces a nonnegative, right-skewed variable. This is the building block of the chi-square family.

Definition. \(U = Z^2 \sim \chi^2_1\). If \(U_1, \ldots, U_m\) are independent \(\chi^2_1\) variables, then \(V = \sum_{i=1}^m U_i \sim \chi^2_m\) with \(E[\chi^2_m] = m\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(\chi^2_m) = 2m\).

Sample variance from normal data. If \(X_1, \ldots, X_n \overset{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} N(\mu, \sigma^2)\), the scaled sample variance follows a chi-square distribution:

\[\frac{(n-1)S^2}{\sigma^2} \sim \chi^2_{n-1}, \qquad S^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^n(X_i - \bar{X})^2.\]

The proof uses the decomposition \(\sum(X_i - \mu)^2 = \sum(X_i - \bar{X})^2 + n(\bar{X} - \mu)^2\), which splits a \(\chi^2_n\) into a \(\chi^2_{n-1}\) term plus a \(\chi^2_1\) term. Crucially, \(\bar{X}\) and \(S^2\) are independent for normal samples — a special property of the normal distribution.

The one degree of freedom “lost” in going from \(\chi^2_n\) to \(\chi^2_{n-1}\) reflects the constraint that the deviations \((X_i - \bar{X})\) must sum to zero.

\(t\) Distribution

When \(\sigma\) is unknown, we replace it by \(S\) in the standardization of \(\bar{X}\). Because \(S\) is random, the resulting statistic is no longer normal.

Definition. Let \(Z \sim N(0,1)\) and \(U \sim \chi^2_\nu\) be independent. Then

\[T = \frac{Z}{\sqrt{U/\nu}} \sim t_\nu.\]

Classical \(t\) statistic. For \(X_1, \ldots, X_n \overset{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} N(\mu, \sigma^2)\),

\[\frac{\bar{X} - \mu}{S/\sqrt{n}} \sim t_{n-1}.\]

The proof matches \(Z = (\bar{X}-\mu)/(\sigma/\sqrt{n}) \sim N(0,1)\) and \(U = (n-1)S^2/\sigma^2 \sim \chi^2_{n-1}\) (independent by the earlier theorem) to the definition of \(t_\nu\) with \(\nu = n-1\).

The \(t\) distribution has heavier tails than the normal because the denominator \(S/\sqrt{n}\) is random — when \(S\) is small, \(T\) is inflated. As \(n \to \infty\), \(S \to \sigma\) stably and the \(t\) distribution converges to \(N(0,1)\).

\(F\) Distribution

The \(F\) distribution arises when comparing two independent variance estimates.

Definition. Let \(U \sim \chi^2_m\) and \(V \sim \chi^2_n\) be independent. Then

\[W = \frac{U/m}{V/n} \sim F_{m,n}.\]

Ratio of sample variances. Let \(X_1, \ldots, X_m \overset{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} N(\mu_X, \sigma^2_X)\) and \(Y_1, \ldots, Y_n \overset{\text{i.i.d.}}{\sim} N(\mu_Y, \sigma^2_Y)\) be independent samples. Then

\[\frac{S_X^2/\sigma_X^2}{S_Y^2/\sigma_Y^2} \sim F_{m-1,\, n-1}.\]

When \(\sigma_X^2 = \sigma_Y^2\), this simplifies to \(S_X^2/S_Y^2 \sim F_{m-1,n-1}\). This is the core probabilistic reason why the \(F\) distribution appears in classical tests for comparing variances and in ANOVA.


Full notes: Download PDF